- Scrivener vs nisus writer pro android#
- Scrivener vs nisus writer pro software#
- Scrivener vs nisus writer pro professional#
- Scrivener vs nisus writer pro mac#
- Scrivener vs nisus writer pro windows#
Such is life this is definitely a minor first-world problem.įor me, though, Scrivener in conjunction with Word or Writer continues to be indispensable. I’m disappointed in the Scrivener developers for abandoning their original intention to support Linux and then breaking compatibility with Wine after a long run of successful betas. I’ll still run Linux as an escape hatch now and then, and I’ll occasionally even write on my Linux laptop: LibreOffice Writer is more or less equivalent to Word on my Mac, and there are many open source writing programs that run fine under Linux. And as Chabon noted in the interview cited above, Scrivener remains by far the best program for long-form writing
Scrivener vs nisus writer pro mac#
Syncing a story or poem from my Mac to my iPhone via Dropbox is an almost ideal way to proofread and revise - there’s something about the iPhone’s smaller screen that enhances focus wonderfully. From an absolute standpoint, the answer is of course “No.” But from the standpoint of convenience and flexibility, I find Scrivener to be invaluable.
Scrivener vs nisus writer pro software#
No more Scrivener on Ubuntu unless or until it simply works under Wine, which may very well be never.Īnd that brings us back to the original question of whether specialized writing software is necessary for writers. Past a certain point, the technology has to defer to the writing.
And by and large, their stuff does “just work.” I run Linux to avoid being completely captive within Apple’s attractive walled garden.īut since my main focus these days is writing, I don’t have time to screw around with software configurations, as I mistakenly did trying to get Scrivener running again on Ubuntu. Apple is not without serious ethical flaws (Asian labor standards, tax policies, Chinese censorship, et al.) but they do seem to be the best commercial platform from the standpoint of privacy and security.
Scrivener vs nisus writer pro android#
That’s why I recently moved from Android to iOS, and why my main computing platform will continue to be macOS. It’s true that, these days, every minimally conscientious citizen needs to pay some attention to the software they run, both for ethical reasons and to protect themselves from the surveillance state (and surveillance capitalism), to the extent this is possible. One should never follow technology down a rabbit hole, and I did precisely that. What’s more, I spent far too much time trying. NET system requirements and I have not found a way to get the program running again on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. For whatever reason, the developers upped the.
Scrivener vs nisus writer pro windows#
I continued to so until quite recently - the Windows beta ran fine under Wine until late last year (Beta 30, I believe). When I reviewed Scrivener 3 a couple of years ago, I was running it on both macOS and Linux (via Wine). And this question was prompted by a recent experience I had with Scrivener itself, which remains the most popular (and capable) program of its kind. The more relevant question today, then, is how can writers make sure today’s technology works for them, rather than the other way ’round.
Michael Chabon, on the other hand, has credited Scrivener (along with iA Writer, DEVONthink, Nisus Writer and numerous Apple products) in the creation of his work. For her, that was obviously the right choice. Kwon, whose debut novel The Incendiaries received very strong reviews, told me she investigated Scrivener but found its complexities too distracting and decided to stick with Word. Is Word alone enough? For some writers, yes. Most writers have acknowledged the usefulness of Scrivener and its competitors, even if they stick with Word or (in some cases) don’t use a computer to write at all. But I don’t believe it remains particularly relevant. This piece in The Atlantic by Scrivener creator Keith Blount, from 2011, sums that stigma up nicely.Įven today, in the third decade of this troubling new century, the question is not entirely resolved.
Scrivener vs nisus writer pro professional#
When specialized software for “creative writing” first began to appear a decade or so back, there was a definite stigma attached to such software by professional writers. The questions above have been making the rounds for a while now. ĭo writers actually need specialized “writing software” such as Scrivener? Or is the publishing industry’s standard word processor, Microsoft Word, sufficient unto itself? You’ll want the AppImage version, available here. Scrivener 3 on Mac or Windows can export to the version 2 format, which the Linux beta version can read, so you can go back and forth between platforms.
Update, : it should be noted that the abandoned Scrivener Linux beta, version 1.9.0.1 with no expiration date, is still a valid option.
0 kommentar(er)
